Timeline for retire [colors] tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://emacs.stackexchange.com/ with https://emacs.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 14, 2015 at 11:50 | comment | added | Malabarba Mod |
the only one that's non trivial to tag is the color picker. I can't think of any tag that really fits it well, so I would just compromise and use faces (even though it's not a good tag here). Generally I would be fine with letting a tag exist because there's one question that really needs it. But this tag in particular is doing more harm than good. It's fragmenting questions about all these other tags, and mixing them up in one meaningless tag.
|
|
| Feb 14, 2015 at 11:21 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @Malabarba What tag would you use for the questions that are actually about colors then? | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 1:26 | comment | added | Malabarba Mod | I agree with your conclusion, but disagree with the conclusions you draw from your conclusion. :-) a tag with 4 definite misuses and 2 legitimate uses is asking to be slaughtered. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 23:37 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |