Skip to main content
replaced http://emacs.stackexchange.com/ with https://emacs.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Conclusion: 4/10 definite misuse of instead of [tags:text-properties], [tags:faces] or [tags:font-lock]. 4/10 where is marginal. 2/10 where is important, including one where it's legitimately the sole tag.

I don't think we can get rid of , though we should discourage its use when the question is really about , , or .

I propose to keep the tag, and write a tag wiki that explains when to use other tags instead. (I'm putting it on my to-do list; if someone wants to do it, they're welcome.) I think we can live with that, and retag mistagged questions as they come in. Let's see how it goes, if we're overwhelmed by misuse we can consider retagging legitimate uses to with a name that discourages misuse.

Conclusion: 4/10 definite misuse of instead of [tags:text-properties], [tags:faces] or [tags:font-lock]. 4/10 where is marginal. 2/10 where is important, including one where it's legitimately the sole tag.

I don't think we can get rid of , though we should discourage its use when the question is really about , , or .

I propose to keep the tag, and write a tag wiki that explains when to use other tags instead. (I'm putting it on my to-do list; if someone wants to do it, they're welcome.) I think we can live with that, and retag mistagged questions as they come in. Let's see how it goes, if we're overwhelmed by misuse we can consider retagging legitimate uses to with a name that discourages misuse.

Conclusion: 4/10 definite misuse of instead of [tags:text-properties], [tags:faces] or [tags:font-lock]. 4/10 where is marginal. 2/10 where is important, including one where it's legitimately the sole tag.

I don't think we can get rid of , though we should discourage its use when the question is really about , , or .

I propose to keep the tag, and write a tag wiki that explains when to use other tags instead. (I'm putting it on my to-do list; if someone wants to do it, they're welcome.) I think we can live with that, and retag mistagged questions as they come in. Let's see how it goes, if we're overwhelmed by misuse we can consider retagging legitimate uses to with a name that discourages misuse.

Source Link

Conclusion: 4/10 definite misuse of instead of [tags:text-properties], [tags:faces] or [tags:font-lock]. 4/10 where is marginal. 2/10 where is important, including one where it's legitimately the sole tag.

I don't think we can get rid of , though we should discourage its use when the question is really about , , or .

I propose to keep the tag, and write a tag wiki that explains when to use other tags instead. (I'm putting it on my to-do list; if someone wants to do it, they're welcome.) I think we can live with that, and retag mistagged questions as they come in. Let's see how it goes, if we're overwhelmed by misuse we can consider retagging legitimate uses to with a name that discourages misuse.