Timeline for Big list question on writing mail with emacs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://emacs.stackexchange.com/ with https://emacs.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 10:42 | comment | added | Joe Corneli | ... although the tag was removed by a moderator, so I fell back to using a "big list -" prefix in the subject line, which seems to be the usage on tex.se | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 10:07 | comment | added | Joe Corneli | Here is another big list question: emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/13197/… (and I created the big-list tag there, feel free to use it on other similar questions). | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 20:24 | comment | added | Steven Arntson | I hope this takes off. I'm a beginning user who has stumbled here and there with email on emacs. Presently I'm limping forward with Gnus, which I chose simply because it was the only thing I could get to work. But it is a little clunky for my actual needs at times. I'm very interested to read concise, up-to-date summaries of available approaches as well as checking the number of upvotes to see what's popular with whom. | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 14:46 | history | edited | T. Verron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 95 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2015 at 10:52 | answer | added | Joe Corneli | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 18, 2014 at 6:29 | history | edited | T. Verron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2014 at 6:29 | comment | added | T. Verron | I don't think short answers should be discouraged, as long as there are people willing to edit them into longer answer. Isn't that why community wiki is for, after all? | |
| Nov 17, 2014 at 22:07 | comment | added | Malabarba Mod | As long as we delineated very clearly here a model for the answers to follow, then yes I think it would be something very helpful. The question will need to specify it's looking for very thorough answers, so that we have a reason to discourage short answers. The problem is whether anyone will be willing to write these long answers. | |
| Nov 17, 2014 at 15:59 | history | asked | T. Verron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |