Timeline for Should we use the <kbd> tag or not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 at 13:15 | comment | added | Jonathan Leech-Pepin | @lunaryron Definitely agree that having them joined is more clear than separate. And I do like them, since they stand out slightly more, but they do have their downsides | |
| Sep 26, 2014 at 4:04 | comment | added | Drew | ...which is yet another reason not to adopt it for the general notation (for keys or command etc. names). | |
| Sep 24, 2014 at 13:59 | comment | added | T. Verron | @lunaryorn Apparently indeed, the <kbd> tag doesn't work in comments, which may be a good argument not to use it at all. | |
| Sep 24, 2014 at 12:40 | comment | added | user227 | <kbd>C-x</kbd> looks better than <kbd>C</kbd>+<kbd>x</kbd>, and imho it does a good job at setting key sequences apart from other inline code. Edit: Oh, great, apparently tags don't work in comments, or did I do anything wrong? | |
| Sep 24, 2014 at 9:47 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |